Before Christmas we invited Anders' mum here to celebrate with us. She was reluctant and declined due to health reasons, despite our efforts to convince her that a combination of bus and train would be nice - she could go by bus to Skien where my brother lives, he'd take her to the train which she'd ride from Skien to Lillehammer (it passes through Oslo, but she wouldn't have to change trains there, which avoids a lot of stress) and she could either go by train from Lillehammer to Trondheim (Lillehammer station has about two platforms) or Anders could go down there to pick her up. The ride home could be similar, or she could go by train all the way if she felt like it.
Well, apparently most of this would have failed:
Only 7 of 10 trains were on schedule (
source, with
details for the recent weeks)("on schedule" means within 4-6 minutes of planned schedule, depending on the distance) the week before Christmas,
the afternoon train from Trondheim to Oslo was stuck for 3 hours(!) at a small station inside Trondheim (it's between the departure station and the first scheduled stop 15 minutes later), with passengers waiting in the cold, and yesterday
the evening train between Trondheim and Oslo was stuck at Otta for 4 hours. And every other day or so they have huge delays around Oslo due to tunnel fires (today) or problems with signalling (in general). I guess they should start having an armada of buses and busdrivers ready to replace the trains on a daily basis, in stead of relying on being able to hire enough alternative transport on the fly (even in the middle of Norway's third largest city this takes 3 hours).
The main problem in Oslo is that the signalling equipment is old and should have been replaced. The train system was reorganized a decade or two ago, and since then things haven't improved - at least not at the right speed. The physical railways and everything on and around them are owned by a public company that gives the right to traffic the railways to commercial or public railway companies (with trains). Since much of the railway traffic is heavily subsidized, politicians have their say here but in general the good ol'
national railways (NSB) has the majority of the railway traffic, with the private
Airport Express between Oslo airport and the city itself (about the only really well-functioning railway distance, although they are also prone to signalling errors and tunnel fires) and a few rather small companies on distances NSB don't find valuable or that politicians don't want to fund. In reality all of these suffer from the structural problems with the railways themselves, but NSB get most of them since they are biggest. I am pretty sure NSB also are part of the problem - schedules, the trains themselves, backup plans and emergency procedures are their responsibility, and when they let people wait for 3 hours less than 10 minutes from Trondheim central station with hardly any information, they have a problem as well as those people responsible for the electricity along the lane. They also try to blame it on the weather - but Norwegian weather is not really that extreme right now, it's just cold (between -10C and -20C) and the long-distance trains regularly experience these temperature ranges over the mountains. Short-distance trains in the Oslo area may be a different story, but predicting temperatures down to -25C even in Oslo shouldn't have been considered extreme or very rare when shopping for trains or when maintaining them afterwards.
I don't have a solution to these problems. I am however a true believer in trains, and wish I could go by train more often. So why don't I? The main reason: it takes too much time. The trains leaves less often than planes or buses.
Between Trondheim and Oslo there are 21 daily plane departures, and 6 train departures. The plane trip takes 55 minutes, add 45 minutes for security and 50 + 25 minutes for transfer to/from the city centres and you're still at less than 3 hours from city to city (with hand luggage and some luck; however the airport shuttle in Trondheim leaves every 15 minutes and the airport express train to Oslo every 10 minutes so no careful planning is necessary). The earliest departure from Trondheim is at 06:10, which means levaing home at a bit before 5, but then I could almost be in the centre of Oslo at 8 am, spend a whole day there and be home for a late dinner at 19ish without too much stress.
By train I could take an overnight train and be in Oslo around 6:45, but this would mean spending the night away from home, and also spending NOK 850 on a sleeping car in addition to the ticket (which is between NOK 200 (by planning well ahead) and NOK 850 (by not planning, but then I'd probably not get one of the rather limited sleeping cars either)). I could also take a morning train (05:40) and be in Oslo at 13:30 - might be in time for some of the after-lunch sessions of the conference, then... The price of a plane ticket would be between NOK 300 and NOK 1200, plus about NOK 300 for transport between the airports and the city, so it's is neither much cheaper nor more expensive than the train option. The hourly rate of the plane trip is about twice the train, since the train trip would always be more than 6.5 hours. And in this case I lean towards a higher hourly rate - I don't want to spend 14 hours travelling to and from a meeting that is probably less than 4 hours long, when I can spend 6 hours in stead.
There is a lot of talk about building a network of long-distance express railways between the biggest cities in Norway. This would be excellent, at least if we're talking less than 4 hours between Trondheim and Oslo - and definitely if it's 3 hours - and with a schedule with enough daily trains, every two hours would be nice, every hour a dream - and even every 4-6 hours like today would be decent, although not enough to replace all plane travels.
Train is a better way of travelling than by plane - less annoying security (although that will probably come to trains, too...), and not least a less interrupted journey: board the train at departure, leave at arrival, and you're done. No more calculation to find the optimal bus departure, board the bus, leave the bus, queue for checkin and security at the airport, wait at the gate, board the plane, leave the plane, walk for the train, board the train, leave the train. I can work on any leg of the journey, but it's interrupted every 30 minutes by plane - on the train it could be 3-4 hours of uninterrupted time. And you could add to that a more environmental friendly way of travelling (most of the electricity here some from hydro-power), which I am generally pro.
But until we're seeing these short travel times between major cities, I am unfortunately more likely to catch a plane for most of my travelling. And I am very glad we didn't convince my mother-in-law to come here by train this Christmas...